Related topics

User Name not showing up in Task Manager
Dwarf Dw...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows 64bit general microsoft public internetexplorer general microsoft public windows vista installation_setup microsoft public windows vista general Hi Dima, This is not a new problem. It has happened on several ocassions previously, most notoriously with

Problem comiling for 64 bit on SunOS 5.8 sparc
But after two days when I checked /proc/cpuinfo it shows 2 * AMD 64 bit processors, while my uname -a gives output like this... Linux niger 2.4.21-4.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Oct 3 17:31:21 EDT 2003 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux Also, my ld command output shows it is 32-bit. I am confused as to why it is not showing 64-bit.

User Name not showing up in Task Manager
Nintendo failed to acknowledge them, 3DO says it can't compete with a cart and its <Darknight> not 64 bit, and Sega says its got nothing for it now so it can't compete They were better off just not showing <Darknight> It wasn't their display it was the content <Nug> Which 3rd party 3D0 machine was the best?

Firefox not showing movies/video
I have had problems with ehci and USB sticks, so I run at Legacy/ USB 1.1 levels in the BIOS. This is with FBSD 6.2, in both 32 and 64 bit modes. And, yeah, I have a CPU in both sockets. :-) Thank you, Bruce -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "I like bad!

Problem booting a J280
Our thresholds for filtering multiposts are very low. What if the multiposts are spaced more than 24 hours apart? Would your filters erase a post a day old? RFDs and CFVs aren't THAT time sensitive IMHO and a day or two delay in getting them distributed is preferable (again, IMHO) to them not showing up at all in

TOC ActiveX not showing
Running a 64bit OS the reserved space can be re-mapped above 4Gb and can still be addressed by the OS. Peter Lawton "RC" <RichChri...@yahoo.com> wrote in Wondering if anyone can help me with this mystery I have 4 GB of RAM installed in my Server but when I pull up msinfo32 it is only showing 3583.47 MB Total

Q: More R13 AutoLISP questions?
Hmmm, the "not showing the machine in any detail" may be a ploy (plot? :-) to thwart attempts to influence a draw [for any conspiracy theorists reading this ;-)]. Thad Interesting article Thad, thanks for posting it. Robert Perkis Glad to have provided some other insights/viewpoints! One additional tidbit: the

jBase5.0 Compilation Error
I guess what I'd like to know is how come, when I invoke any memory management tool within Sysmon, it doesn't graduate to the entire 48MB that is installed on my system? thanks John -- SYSTEM: Processor: 150Mhz Intel Pentium Drives: 2.1GB HD/8X CD ROM/1.44 Diskette Video: 1MB Video DRAM/64bit PCI graphics Memory:

nnimap not showing #shared folders
Otoh, you probably are not spoilt for choice of driver versions on 64 bit XP. Just loading xp 64 bit atm, should be good for a laugh :) Just a plain ol' nvidia geforce 6600, but it's a pretty common problem going by the number of results Google returns. The Microsoft guru in our building said that he thinks there

RAM not showing as correct number
The Wow6432Node node is not mentioned in the KB article. But if you put these settings, [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\HTMLHelp\1. x\HHRestrictions] "MaxAllowedZone"=dword:00000002 into a text file with the extention .reg, then run/open it, the windows registry editor will merge them into your registry.

XP Pro 32 or 64 bit
In addition, HCRX and VISUALIZE-48 graphics cards were not supported with 64 bit HP-UX 11.00. If you can't get to the system via the network, I would suggest booting with My thought is that the OS is trying to display to the primary console, and thus not showing up on the terminal. Does that sound plausible?

KB937287 keeps showing up on my 64-bit Vista UE.
You are prob. getting an error message when you try to reinstall the update -- once it is installed it states that you can not remove it. I am unable to get it to stop showing up in my 64-bit Vista UE's Windows Update even though it was a success. All other today's updates were fine except one (KB937287 failed)

KB937287 keeps showing up on my 64-bit Vista UE.
"xiowan" wrote: Hello "Phillip Pi": I am getting the same update showing as not installed after two tries also. I am running Vista Ultimate 64 bit with an Intel Quadcore cpu and after the second installation attempt it said to restart and after okaying the re-start it shut down and the re-start failed leaving me a

64bit counters not showing up.
JP j...@hotmail.com microsoft public windows vista general 1. Vista 32 bit will support up to 4GB of RAM. Not sure where some of these people are getting their info from. (scroll down to the middle of the page - it talks about memory) http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/editions/64bit.mspx 2.

64bit counters not showing up.
MrSpock MrSpock.34o...@no-mx.forums.net microsoft public windows vista installation_setup I have the same problem. The update is not present in "systeminfo". -- MrSpock.

vista ultimative 64 not showing ram
xiowan xio...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windowsupdate microsoft public windows vista installation_setup microsoft public windows vista general Hello "Phillip Pi": I am getting the same update showing as not installed after two tries also. I am running Vista Ultimate 64 bit with an Intel Quadcore

User Name not showing up in Task Manager
WINDOWS MEDIA PLAYER 11 IS NOT ABILITY TO WORK IN THE WINDOWS VISTA BECAUSE THE VISTA HAVE WINDOWS MIDIA CENTER. THIS SOFT IS BETTER THAN WMP 11. This is particularly annoying because now my computer can no longer connect to streaming media though I would prefer not to have to reformat just to regain the

Cumulative Security Update for IE stops IE7 from showing web p
Reading the same question over and over again and not knowing which thread is the real answer is tiresome. Just point out who has the correct answer would be most appreciated, if it's not too much to ask. You took the time to post so why not post the link or the user name. Geeeeeesus "Jim" wrote: Read the entire

RAM not showing up correctly
I have Vista Ultimate 32 bit, I just added to additional sticks of RAM making a total of 4 GB, System shows 3070 MB, any ideas or sugestions. Thanks. Install Vista64 if you want to use your RAM. Will 64-bit Vista install on a 32-bit machine? No. -- Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM www.fjsmjs.com Do not reply with.

64bit counters not showing up.
raydaftYaTP>, Pat wrote: Does anyone have a feel for how much faster code might run on a 64 bit platform like this (with 64 bit binaries) compared to a high end P4 system? Seem to remember past comparisons not showing that much of a speed advantage, and that the larger addressing space was the big attaction of 64